Hank Smith:                      00:00:00             Coming up in this episode on followHIM.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:00:02             Here they were. They had the priesthood, and this is a distinctive thing about our faith is they would have the priesthood so they could conduct that service. They could have the sacrament. They were organized into groups. This was a first in World War II and they would have the emblems of the sacrament. Elder Maxwell described it as being something of a roll call to know if there had been any casualties in the previous week. Now, that’s sobering to me the notion that someone might not show up this week that was here the previous meeting. He shared that, but I also remember his saying as part of the interview, that he felt he was so fortunate he never came to hate the enemy, that he was spared that kind of an emotion of true hatred for the enemy. That he just conducted his service as best he could, obviously facing danger on a daily basis. Little did he know that many years later he would return to that same place, to Okinawa to dedicate a church worship edifice. To hear him talk about that and reflect on those experiences was a powerful, inspiring really, opportunity that I recall very well.

Hank Smith:                      00:01:29             Hello everyone. Welcome to another episode of followHIM. My name is Hank Smith. I am your host. I’m here with my co-host John Bytheway, who is a fountain of truth. John, that’s section 85 verse seven. I read fountain of truth and thought, wow. That’s John Bytheway.

John Bytheway:               00:01:45             All I can do is laugh. Yeah, or fountain of something. Yeah.

Hank Smith:                      00:01:51             Fountain of something. John, we are in sections 85, 86 and 87 today. Joining us is Professor Robert Freeman. To me, he’s a good friend. I call him Bob. Bob, welcome to followHIM.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:02:04             Sure nice to be with you.

Hank Smith:                      00:02:07             I’ve been waiting a long time for this. I’m excited for it. John, when you think post section 76, everything has changed. Now, we’ve talked about that for the last couple of weeks. We get into these sections and one is about war. It’s such a fascinating topic. What comes to mind as you were thinking about this?

John Bytheway:               00:02:27             I thought also about the Book of Mormon and about the war chapters there really that question that I think we all wrestle with. How do we view war? How do we do that? When does God tell us that’s something we have to do or need to do? I’m looking forward to that discussion because this planet has been full of war ever since the beginning. These sections are no different. Neither was the Book of Mormon.

Hank Smith:                      00:02:55             John that’s exactly why I asked Bob to come on the podcast this week, is his experience studying war and the church. Bob, what are we looking forward to today? As you’ve prepared.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:03:08             These are great sections. They’re short in numbers of verses, but powerful in purpose and message. It’s interesting. They’re sandwiched between two other really important sections. 84 stands on its own as does 88 on the list of really important revelations to consider in terms of my own interest and background, well, it’s modest to be sure, but I have made a career out of studying the experiences in our dispensation of Latter-day Saints going forward in times of war. The impact that has had on their lives and the impact that their service has on the church and on the nations. It is plural, nations that they have served and represented. I hope I can add something of value to this discussion.

Hank Smith:                      00:03:57             Yeah, I’m excited for this Bob. John in 2010, I taught my first class at BYU. Summer of 2010. One of the first people I met was Bob Freeman. Big smile, big handshake, and a welcome to BYU. I needed that, Bob. I probably didn’t act like it. I probably acted super confident, but I needed someone to greet me and say, Hey, you belong here. Because I sure felt like I was underqualified in every way. John, I know you know Bob as well. Maybe a little further back than 2010.

John Bytheway:               00:04:31             I think I first met Bob and we shook hands. We were having some of our early counselor meetings at the Riviera Apartments. Do you remember that? I think the dorms were undergoing renovation or something, and we had some of our training over at the Riviera. I met you there, so I am like one year home from a mission less than a year home from a mission. It’s 84, I think.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:04:54             Yeah. I was hoping you wouldn’t give the year away, John.

Hank Smith:                      00:04:56             I was going to say this is the 19 hundreds.

John Bytheway:               00:04:58             Well, it was a national championship year. It was a little hard to forget at BYU. We met then and were doing especially for youth, EFY. Not to be confused with FSY. We’ve known each other for a while. Have you saved any of your counselor shirts?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:05:18              No. There would be no purpose in that, John. I wouldn’t fit them well.

Hank Smith:                      00:05:22             John and Bob, tell us about the first year of EFY, because that’s where FSY came from.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:05:30             And I’ll defer to John. He lived it.

John Bytheway:               00:05:34             You might know that my, gathering dust, even right now as we speak, is my master’s thesis on the history of EFY. I was really grateful that my master’s was in religious education, and when I proposed that as a topic, I was so grateful that they said, yeah, somebody ought to do that. The first especially for youth was actually in 1976, they only had, what was it, 127 participants. They didn’t know what to call it. They said let’s call it especially for youth until we can think of something better. That was, it was really fun to research that and write about it. See, I went on to my mission to the Philippines. My first companion was an awesome tall guy named Elder Charles Edgar Buchanan III. He, when I got home from my mission, said, John, come and do EFY. I just fell in love with the program and the impact we were having and moved to Provo and I really looked back to Elder Buchanan and my mission and God putting those things in place, at least for me, I think was a tender mercy. He changed my life. My mission changed my life.

Hank Smith:                      00:06:44             Yeah, and so many other people’s lives with the John Bytheway work. We need to thank Elder Buchanan for that. Bob, what do you remember from EFY?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:06:53             Not a lot. What John’s adding is actually informing me. I just recall holding on to the coattails of John and and it was a great summer job. John and I were talking before we went on air that the greatest part of the program back in that day was the counselors lives were being impacted on the front lines, but then of course, the youth themselves really helped me to see that, something about that mission service, something about what I was experiencing as a student at BYU. They were blessing my life and instilling a confidence in what I could do going forward. It’s just interesting how career and life have played out in my life since then. I attribute a lot of it to those early days and experiences like EFY.

Hank Smith:                      00:07:44             Oh, that’s great. I was an EFY counselor, but much later than you guys. It was the 1990s. Now, tell us a little bit more about Bob. John, what do we know?

John Bytheway:               00:07:53             Yes. Well, in fact, I grabbed this because I’m so thankful of the work that Bob and Dennis Wright have done. This is my Saints at War book. After serving his mission to London, England, Robert Freeman completed his undergraduate degree at Brigham Young University, then attended law school at Western State University in Fullerton, California. Following a fulfilling career with their church educational system, Robert became a full-time faculty member at the BYU University’s Department of Church History and Doctrine in 1996. Robert and his wife, Janelle Bacon Freeman are the parents of six children and live in Springville, Utah.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:08:30             We still live in Springville and now well, five of those seven kids have married and gone on in life. We’re down to pretty much empty nester status. It’s an exciting season of life for sure. Just love the opportunity to be involved in education at BYU and hope some of your viewers have felt a blessing in their students as they’ve gone through the religious education aspect of the BYU education. To have tutelage under myself and others of my associates that we just really try to dedicate ourselves to their purposes and needs and their futures as disciples of Christ that they can go forward and enter to learn, go forth to serve, really make a difference in this very complex time that we live through. This ties back to the devotion I have to research of our saints in wartime. John, what are you doing? Pulling a book out?

                                           00:09:27             I haven’t seen that for too long there. The cover of that first volume. We’ve actually gone on and published, I think seven or eight volumes since that time relating to different conflicts and the different times and the dispensation and where our saints have been. One of the things that I want to say early on is first deep gratitude to my wife, who has been a key research assistant to me through all the 25 plus years that this has been my research focus and to our children who love and adore. They’ve come to know and love these veterans the way I have, and that’s been a blessing for sure. I want to say that our saints have been in all the major conflicts of the dispensation and have been key participants really heroic in their contributions, yet humble, dedicated. They really turn back praise or too much accolades.

                                           00:10:20             They don’t think of themselves in that way, but they have gone forward to serve in times of a need. Wars and rumors of war continue to be so sadly a consistent pattern, if you will, which is of course scripturally very much connected to what the prophecies have instructed would happen, but certainly Satan has really used war as a way to divide the human family. Everything about it is antithetical to or in opposition to Christ, the Prince of Peace. We just continue forward through these times holding hands, if you will, figuratively, that we can come through and surmount any challenge or obstacle that Satan puts in our way in this kind of a context of war.

Hank Smith:                      00:11:10             I’m really looking forward to today and hearing these veterans, Bob, there’s something that stirs the soul when you start to talk about these saints. Let me read from the Come, Follow Me manual to start us off. It begins this way. Christmas day is usually a time to ponder messages like peace on earth, but on December 25th, 1832, Joseph Smith’s mind was occupied with the threat of war. The state of South Carolina in the United States had justified the government and was preparing for battle. The Lord revealed that this was only the beginning. War, he declared, will be poured out upon all nations. It seemed like this prophecy would be fulfilled very soon, but then it wasn’t. Within a few weeks, South Carolina, the United States government reached a compromise and war was averted. Prophecy, however, is not always fulfilled at the time or the way we expect. Nearly 30 years later, long after Joseph Smith was martyred, South Carolina rebelled and civil war followed. Today, war throughout the modern world continues to cause the earth to mourn. The value of this revelation is less in predicting when calamity will come and more in teaching what to do when it comes. The council is the same in 1831, 1861 and 2025 stand ye in holy places and be not moved. Hmm. Bob with that, where do we want to start?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:12:37             I think we’re just fine to begin with 85. This is a revelation that comes at a time in church history, of course, that there have developed two church centers. We have here in Kirtland the place of this revelation. Really a letter authored primarily by Joseph Smith and to William, W. W. Phelps. Section 85 really is all essentially in Joseph’s handwriting, which is matters all by itself, really kind of a dual voice. Some of this Joseph’s first person and some of it in the Lord’s first person instruction. We have key personalities of the early dispensation, most notably probably Edward Partridge, our new and first bishop involved in this. It’s at a time when principles associated with the law of consecration are coming into play. W. W. Phelps is at this point in independence, Missouri, and he’s leading the saints there. They’re about 800 in number who have now come to that new gathering place.

                                           00:13:53             In that spirit of establishing Zion and oneness, the principles of the law of consecration are being implemented, but it’s having an uneven reception, if you will. Some are being hesitant in their willingness to dedicate fully to living those principles. We look back in 20/20 hindsight here. I think most of us acknowledge that well, that was a big step, was a stretch. We’re empathetic to some of this, but deeds are still being taken in the name of the owner when in fact the principle teaches to consecrate over to the church and then receive your inheritance back. The Lord is warning in section 85 against that practice. Even Edward Partridge’s own role as a bishop slash administrator is being examined here a little bit and how is the function of that in the day-to-day practice going to look, and there’s a sort of coming to of what this requires of our dedicated hearts and minds and that’s hard.

Hank Smith:                      00:15:05             Yeah, that’s hard. As you were telling us about these people, it’s a little hard to make that step into consecration. I thought that’s hard for a lot of us. I know it’s hard for John, not necessarily for me, but I know this is hard for everyone on paper and in my head it sounds good. It sounds, but then when the moment comes, can I do it? John, do you remember Dr. Rosalynde Welch was with us a couple of weeks ago and she said, your relationship with your possessions changes in consecration. At one point, you’re the owner, this is yours, and then when you consecrate it, you’re the steward. You’re caring for it even though it’s the same property. I’ve never forgotten that. I think maybe it’s hard to give up that “this is mine” role to “I’m a steward”.

John Bytheway:               00:15:56             There’s the real and the ideal. I think, like you said, we all can hear the ideal and go, ooh, yeah, that sounds good. That sounds good. Then when it comes to your own stuff you’re like, oh, I kind of worked really hard over the years to get that.

Hank Smith:                      00:16:12             That.

John Bytheway:               00:16:13             What about those people that don’t work hard at all? We start looking sideways like the parable of the laborers in the vineyard.

Hank Smith:                      00:16:22             Yeah. Then Joseph Smith is what, a thousand miles away and you’re thinking, does he really know what’s going on? What I’m sacrificing here? Bob, so this section 85, is it more of a correction? Is it the Lord being really firm here?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:16:40             I think there’s some mix of correction, also a hopeful tone that if accepting the principles the way they are being laid out is in alignment with our hearts and our minds we can get there and be blessed in that process. It’s just the ongoing and unfolding that these principles is at the core, at the center of, of much of what is intended in establishing Zion. Well, it makes sense because setting aside some of these tendencies you’ve just drawn out, that is the sort of the human frailties part of our existence. That’s a hard thing. We do hard things in the process. We give our lives over to the Lord knowing that he can make a whole lot more out of our lives than we can and our community and this seeking or aspiring to oneness, that’s the hopeful part I think of the message. One of those who is in direct focus, and it’s clear in the text and in the Joseph Smith papers you see, this is William McClellan. He has been the subject of writing by our esteemed senior colleague, Larry Porter in his seminal work on William’s life where you just see these ups and downs and when he catches the vision, he contributes in great ways. Then there’s hesitancy. He’s one of those taking deeds in his own name. That’s a hard place to be in connection with this kind of a revelation and teaching. We just have to get there.

Hank Smith:                      00:18:17             Bob, when you say taking deeds in his own name, the idea is I’m going to deed this to the church. It’s now property of the church. They’re going to give back to me, but I’m the steward now.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:18:28             John’s talking of the steward. Isn’t that a beautiful word steward? We still have an interest in magnifying and making it flourish just as any other relationship role, I’m an attorney by training. I think of deeds and contracts they lay out in ways that the laws of man describe and establish relationship, but stewardship on the Lord’s way. It’s a call to continue to make things flourish, dedicating them to really ultimately his purposes. What a great way to do life.

Hank Smith:                      00:19:06             There’s some then in Missouri who aren’t doing that. They’re keeping their possessions in their name.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:19:13             That will be a pattern that maintains, we’ll see it even after the saints removal to the West that it visits again and again. We have to ask ourselves, as we look at the text now, we reflect on history. Where would I have been in this connection? Would I have been a willing heart and run, not just walk, toward obedience to that call?

Hank Smith:                      00:19:39             Yeah, you see some today who drop everything, give it to the Lord and go out.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:19:46             Some of them come from the most humble climbs in situations. Somebody might criticize that. Well, of course it’s easy. No, I think to be in a very modest place in terms of your temporal possessions and to just say, still, I will give whatever the Lord asks. That’s a monument to me of obedience and dedication of discipleship.

Hank Smith:                      00:20:07             Yeah, it’s happening all throughout the church. Are there any verses we could highlight from section 85 that you want to look at?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:20:15             Well, I’m worried I’m taking some things out of order here a little bit. Right at verse one is important for us because there’s sort of mechanics of how this happens too. The Lord is calling on Joseph to instruct and Edward Partridge again a part of this that a history and record, and I might emphasize especially the record aspect of this here, less a personal history image coming to my mind, but let’s keep a record. This will be something that happens again and again in the Doctrine & Covenants at key times. It will happen with the Nauvoo temple when the call is made to build the Nauvoo temple, to keep a record of what is happening on the errand of the Lord. In furtherance of that call and hear the call to practice the principles of consecration. Joseph goes out on the very day that this revelation is coming into play and acquires that record and that record will be used going forward to maintain who is in and can be counted on in regards to this call to obedience.

                                           00:21:32             I think that’s important, but right behind that, my favorite verse two also is that there’s also to keep in that record the manner of life, their faith, their works. In a way, it’s recording how we proceed into this practice, this community covenant, if you will, the dividends and the blessings that we see as an outcome of that commitment. I looked up the word manner coming into our discussion and thinking, what do I think of when I think of the manner and the suggestion that I received in the dictionary definitions, there were the way we live, display our habits, our conduct, our approach to life, how do we do life? We elevate through practices such as we’re describing here with the law of consecration, our plane, if you will, of life. Then the dividend blessings come and we record those as well. Thus we see because they were obedient, these good things happened in their lives. They prospered in the ways the Lord defines prospering. It may not be the world’s more secular view of what prospering means, but in the Lord’s view.

Hank Smith:                      00:22:53             Thus we see, I like that. That’s a Book of Mormon phrase. They did this and thus we see here is what happened. I’ve never noticed this. We want to keep a record of those who have that kind of faith. They follow through, they consecrate their property and let’s see what happens. Record their manner of life, their faith and their works, and record those who leave, record those who apostatize after receiving their inheritance.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:23:22             I like the word firm because it sounds just a little gentler than condemnation, but the Lord is very firm. In this letter turned revelation, the consequences to those who reject the call to Zion, to consecration.

Hank Smith:                      00:23:39             Wow.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:23:40             It’s just as you describe Hank.

Hank Smith:                      00:23:41             I really like this Bob, that maybe there’s something about me that I’m going to hand this over or maybe it’s selfish. John, you can tell me that my name is recorded, that me and my family are recorded as having done this for posterity’s sake that I did this. I don’t think the Lord’s against that. What do you think, John?

John Bytheway:               00:24:00             Sometimes I think, why am I keeping a journal? Aren’t angels writing down everything? Isn’t a record being kept in heaven for everything? Perhaps this can also help us look at our ancestors, see what they did, what they sacrificed. I sure think we’re living in the time of President Harold B. Lee called it the test of gold. When I have to have lessons on the law of the fast because I haven’t been forced to fast like the pioneers did that had nothing to eat. I haven’t known a day of hunger unless I chose to on fast day. You know what I mean? Man, we have a different challenge. I don’t know. I’m just thinking, could this record also be so that we can read it and learn from those that went before us maybe?

Hank Smith:                      00:24:46             Yeah.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:24:47             We’ll finish our discussion today probably in section 87, I think of the military nomenclature. We have so many acronyms in military context. AWOL is one of them that I think I knew of from very early age and what the Lord is trying to do here, and we’re going to see it in section 86 as well with the parable of the weed and the tare. He’s trying to have folks understand that there’s a firm line between the dedicated disciple and the one who, well, maybe I’ll get around to it sometime, but not today. Really, the latter camp falls into the AWOL camp. They’re absent without leave. They’ve been invited to a covenant, to a level and standard of living that the Lord knows will in the end greatly enhance and bless not just for mortality but for eternity. He wants every one of his children to have that appetite, if you will, that desire, that yearning for that brand of living, that manner of living, disappointed for sure, but also that there is a consequence affixed to that rejection is what is entailed in section 85.

Hank Smith:                      00:26:04             I love that. He’s inviting us into a space where the blessings are immense. Come in, come in. Bob let’s keep going. What’s next in this section you want to look at?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:26:15             Again we’ve got this same three times in this section. We see it again in verse four, their genealogy to be kept. Verse five, the book of the law of God. These are all essentially the same invoking of a record as the section plays out. Then it talks about those who find themselves on the outside looking in, if you will. Verse nine, all they who are not found written in the book of remembrance, that’s yet another mention of the record, shall find none inheritance in that day, but they shall be cut asunder and their portion appointed them among the unbelievers where are wailing and gnashing of teeth. A very undesirable outcome. Ironically, as I hug too closely to the things of the temporal kind and I’m unwilling to practice what the Lord has guided me to as a disciple of Christ, as I hug that, ultimately I lose even that. I lose it all. That is not where I wanted to be. That was not what I envisioned even in my hesitancy to live the higher law. Of course, the principles of the law of consecration are with us still. As we attend the temple and as we participate in covenants, we know that we are still called to be willing and able to give our all. We should in our daily walk, be a covenant people willing to dedicate our all. We still have those invitations. How well do I abide that?

Hank Smith:                      00:28:00             Yeah. I really appreciate this side you might say of the Lord? Me in general, I love to hear the Lord’s I will forgive, I will love, I am here for you, but I do appreciate I think that makes that more meaningful when there is a line, there is firmness here where the Lord says, if you don’t follow through, there are consequences coming that are terrible. I appreciate that. I think that’s an act of love.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:28:31             Notice time is of the essence. The Lord is so patient. He is so patient with me. My life, my shortcomings, my continuing effort to become, to get there. But in this historical context, time was of the essence. The Lord had things that needed to be done. They needed to be done in a sequence in time to move this restoration, these early moments of the restoration forward to what was next. The patience seems a little less. The saints need to get there. It’s a little like the call to build the Kirtland temple, and I can’t think of the Kirtland temple without thinking that I was just last summer with you, Hank in Kirtland.

Hank Smith:                      00:29:18             Yeah.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:29:19             I have a picture in my mind’s eye of you and your family on the back of a rocket ship, I think in a local town parade.

Hank Smith:                      00:29:25             Yep. That’s exactly right.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:29:26             I think I have the picture still. We were celebrating the moment in history when the church acquired again the Kirtland temple and some of the key documents and the properties there both in Kirtland and Nauvoo. When the errand of the Lord was to build a temple in those early days, he chastened the saints when they fell a little behind in the timeframe that he needed them to be working in. It’s a little like that in section 85 that the time is now. I need it now. Sound familiar to parents? Sometimes they’re trying to chasten gently a son or daughter that hey, I’ve got to have you meet your moment here. Whether it’s the home chores or something a little bigger. This is your moment. Let’s seize the day.

John Bytheway:               00:30:13             Have you ever heard people say they tried the law of consecration and it didn’t work? Now we’re not living it. I’ve heard different answers to that. I’d love to hear what you guys would say.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:30:24             It is still with us today. You see it in our temple worship and in other settings. Hasn’t gone away. It takes a little different form perhaps than what we might see here in this record of time.

Hank Smith:                      00:30:36             Yeah, there’s a myth out there, John. I think you’re right, where someone might say, oh, the law of consecration, they tried it. It didn’t work, so God took that away and gave them tithing. For some reason that myth has taken hold among some, but that’s not the case. We covenant to live the law of consecration in our temple covenants. I had a student once say, when are we going to start to live the law of consecration? And I said, you mean me and you? We both probably should very soon. Thinking, oh, when’s it going to come back? It never went away.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:31:10             Notice in verse three of section 85, the Lord is still talking about tithing. This is an all in situation and whatever form he’s inviting in a particular moment of time, are we all in? And again, it’s not can we bring the technical obedience too, it’s the heart. It’s really where our heart is in terms of the hundred percent devotion.

John Bytheway:               00:31:36             The hymn that we sing so often captures the heart that you’re talking about, Bob. Because I Have Been Given Much I Too Must Give. Or the big one I’ll Go Where You Want Me To Go. I’ll do what you want me to do. I’ll be what you want me to be. But Thursday really doesn’t work for me. The canning assignment.

Hank Smith:                      00:31:55             Thursday doesn’t really work for me.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:32:00             I have my wife’s only sister and her husband just returning from service as mission leaders in Peru this month. We all know these folks in our lives that are just called in a moment’s notice to leave careers and family and in such a dedicated way, just leave it all behind. Go serve the Lord in this way in a remarkable way. Anyone who’s queried former mission president leadership about what the experience is like, talk about 24-7. The Sabbath day takes on a little different look when you’re in that kind of a service. We see it with other leadership of course, but that level of commitment of just, I’ll go where you want me to go, dear Lord, as you say, John. I mean how do I get there? How do I become that person if we find ourselves still wanting in those ways?

Hank Smith:                      00:32:55             Wow.

John Bytheway:               00:32:57             I wonder if there’s any mission leader who’ve ever thought this came at a really perfect time.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:33:05             I’m sure they’re there, John, but I just haven’t met them.

John Bytheway:               00:33:08             Yeah, I haven’t either. This is a great time to leave my grandkids. You know?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:33:11             I know it’s a name familiar to all of us, but I was the interim department chair last year when Lloyd and Karmel Newell accepted their call to go and serve. I visited with Lloyd several times about how hard this was for him, that there was no hesitancy. There was no question what they would do, but on a personal level, in his case, leaving the service 39 years as the voice of the Tabernacle choir, that’s pretty good mission and dedication all by itself. Then his time at BYU drawing to a close, he wasn’t sure that was when he wanted to retire, but the Lord said that was the time, so it became the time. What a thing to admire.

Hank Smith:                      00:33:51             Yeah, my good friends Jason and Amber Kilgore, they got a call to serve as mission leaders right in the middle of marriages and grandkids. Yeah, you just do it. You just go and you consecrate yourself to the work.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:34:07             Senior couple yesterday giving a report of their mission to Australia in a member support capacity and the miracles they were able to share. I mean, my wife and I were pushing back tears the entire message because you just said, where do I sign up? I want to go there. It was amazing what they’d been a part of so humbly, what a great way to give to the Lord. Consecration.

Hank Smith:                      00:34:36             This discussion reminds me of this thought from Elder Christofferson. True success in this life comes in consecrating our lives, that is our time and choices to God’s purposes. Bob, this is to your point, the Lord is offering us an opportunity here. This is Elder Christofferson. In so doing, consecration, we permit him to raise us to our highest destiny.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:35:04             Who doesn’t want that?

Hank Smith:                      00:35:05             Yep, not necessarily a sacrifice at all when you know what the Lord’s intention is.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:35:13             I want to draw our attention to verse six for just a moment if we can. I just thought this is really one of those places where a relatively short verse has a powerful compare and contrast. On the one hand, we’re drawn into the verse with the phrase familiar to us in various scriptures. The Lord works through a still small voice which whispereth through and pierceth all things. Already I’m seeing the contrast. On the one hand, it’s a still small voice. I want to say that in a hushed tone, a still small voice, which then is followed with this and pierceth all things. That’s like body armor. Suddenly, how does that happen? The still small voice pierceth all things and oftentimes it maketh my bones to quake. Why John and Hank that just makes my bones quake.

Hank Smith:                      00:36:11             Right. Yeah.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:36:14             About what does that imply? Any thoughts?

Hank Smith:                      00:36:19             Reminds me of third nephi, doesn’t it? They heard the voice and it pierced them to the soul.

John Bytheway:               00:36:24             Mm-hmm. President Boyd K. Packer had said once, we don’t have the words. And then he said, amazingly, even the scriptures don’t have the words that perfectly describe the Spirit. There’s so many descriptions, but Hank, I went where you did, I’m looking at 3 Nephi 11:3. It was not a harsh voice, neither was it a loud voice. Nevertheless and notwithstanding it being a small voice, it did pierce them that did hear it to the center. It’s the same kind of paradox. It’s small, it’s quiet, it’s not loud, but whoa, it had an impact. It went right through me. Which is a really great attempt to try to describe that.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:37:02             I wouldn’t want to be out of place here, but I’m having come to mind one or two times when my wife has tried gentle persuasion with a soft voice. But something that she said in that gentle persuasion, it still pierced me to the heart that I ought to act a little more like the priesthood holder I’m supposed to be in the home that can take a little gentle whisper and run with it. It’s a call to a higher holier level of living.

John Bytheway:               00:37:33             I’m reminded of a President Henry B. Eyring statement, which I’ve always loved. He said, don’t be surprised if when you feel the Spirit, it’s accompanied by what you feel is a rebuke. I’ve tried to illustrate this with the teenagers. If you can see my hand, this is the symbol of scolding, but don’t be surprised if when you feel the Spirit, it’s accompanied by a rebuke. A come up to higher ground. I changed from scolding to an invitation to you can do better. You know you can. Come on up here. I like that. That’s both of those.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:38:10             Yeah, that’s powerful. Then at verse seven, we have this phrase that’s gotten a fair amount of play and commentary in the commentaries that you can read on the Doctrine & Covenants in this section in particular, that the Lord God will send one mighty and strong holding the scepter of power in his hand, clothed with light for a covering. What does that entail? And then the discussion that follows there in scripture.

John Bytheway:               00:38:42             Well, I was hoping that Hank might have described me as mighty and strong, but it didn’t even enter his mind. It reminds me of a certain episode of the Andy Griffith Show. When Barney is getting his blood pressure taken, the doctor’s wrapping the thing around his arm and suddenly the doctor looks kind of alarmed and Barney says, what’s the matter? The doctor says, well, nothing. I’ve just never been able to wrap it around that many times before.

Hank Smith:                      00:39:12             And what does Barney say, John, do you remember?

John Bytheway:               00:39:15             He says something like, ah you won’t find much horse flesh. We Fifes are wiry. You know, something like that so.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:39:20             He wasn’t the model for Arnold Friberg’s paintings at that stage of life.

John Bytheway:               00:39:30             No. No. He was last on the list. Yeah, I did have something from Susan Easton Black’s book about this. She talked about what was happening and said Bishop Edward Partridge was able to resolve the problems that caused difficulty among the church members in Jackson County. Therefore, the need to send one mighty and strong to set in order the house of God and to arrange by lot the inheritances of the saints was unnecessary through time. However, some Latter-day Saints have interpreted the sending of one mighty and strong as a future event. This has led to then there’s a quote from a book by Joseph Fielding Smith. This has led to quote, no end of needless speculation due to a misunderstanding of what is written to counteract those who claim to be the prophesied one mighty and strong. On November 13th, 1905, the first presidency issued a proclamation refuting such claims. Isn’t that interesting?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:40:31             I came across that as well. John, I’m so glad you invoked the name of Susan. In her writing there’s a volume she authored entitled Who’s Who in the Doctrine & Covenants. It was done a good number of years ago, but in my early career I found it really useful to go through and see just in brief bios of the different names that appear in the Doctrine & Covenants, how as the record plays out where they are eventually in their standing relative to the work. Any is too many, but there are too many of those personalities that they hesitated, they pulled back some, became enemies of the church, and we know this. We speak of this on occasion with certain developments of historical events such that that’s the warning and that’s the firmness the Lord is trying to bring to this instruction so that we get there, that we understand the memo, if you will, that the scripture memo of what it is we’re to rise to become.

Hank Smith:                      00:41:34             What do you want to look at here?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:41:36             Well, I think there’s some pretty straightforward things that set up right at the outset of this section who are the sowers of the seed? Verse two, the apostles are the sowers and the field is the world. Then we’re trying to understand the relationship between the wheat and the tares. This is a really a remarkable treatment of one of the most important of the parables the Savior imparts in the New Testament. Even one of those few that has a name, the parable of the wheat and the tares. With just that much I’m so intrigued and interested to know what you two have experienced as you’ve taught this on a regular basis in the the classrooms of the church.

John Bytheway:               00:42:24             I just love looking at the synopsis. The Lord gives the meaning of the parable of the wheat and tares. It’s just like, what more could you ask for? Because sometimes he would give a parable and just walk away leaving everybody, what? In Matthew 13 where this parable comes from. First he gives the parable of the sower. People walk away and then the apostles come up and say, Hey, why are you speaking in parables? And well, he quotes the calling of Isaiah, so will see with their eyes hear with their ears, understand with their heart, be converted and be healed, but some won’t. And then he says hear now the interpretation. Wow. Well, we get the interpretation of the parable of the sower, but here we get an interpretation of the wheat and the tares. I just love when the Lord gives the interpretation. You don’t have to guess and speculate anymore. Hank, I don’t know about you, but look at the strong words of verse three. After they’ve fallen asleep, the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon. I mean, we were not allowed to say that word when we were kids, even though it’s a scriptural word, and then even Satan, he soweth the tares. The tares choke the wheat, drive the church into the wilderness. Wow. Here we’ve got the Lord giving the interpretation. I want to hear what you’re going to say, Hank.

Hank Smith:                      00:43:49             Well, I’m fascinated by this because verse three, he brings in a little bit of first Nephi, the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon. There’s some references there to Nephi’s vision of the great and spacious building, which is a fun little connection to make that makes you look differently at the parable of the wheat and the tares thinking, oh, it’s very similar to the tree versus the building that we know so much about. That both are drawing. They’re a sieve, I’ve got to go one way or the other. I go towards the tree or I go towards the building. All of a sudden, John, you’re a fan of making those connections from like sister chapters and when you can find a sister chapter, all of a sudden things open up to you. Kind of like Alma 32. We learn about the seed and the tree, and then it connects to first Nephi eight and connects to the sower.

                                           00:44:45             You make those connections across books and across chapters that can open up things for you. The idea that the tares, the great and spacious building chokes the wheat and drives the church into the wilderness. Doesn’t that sound familiar to those who what does it say are laughing and scoffing pointing their fingers? The tares choke the wheat and drive the church into the wilderness, but then the connection to the latter-days, but in the last days, here comes the blade springing up. It’s still tender, it’s still our young church. It’s not even three years old yet, but here comes the wheat.

John Bytheway:               00:45:26             Hank, I love and Bob, the agricultural metaphors because there are things we can relate to, even with a little bit of doing gardening, and Hank, can I state that again because I think it’s so fascinating that Jesus gives the parable of the four kinds of soils. It’s better named that Elder McConkie and Elder Talmage both called it the four types of soil. If you’re going to go plant something in your yard, the first question you should ask is, what kind of soil do I have? Because you’ve got to prep the soil first. Jesus is talking about prepping the soil. Then as you said, Hank, we get into the Book of Mormon and Alma says, I’m going to plant the word in your hearts, which you currently don’t believe because I heard your buddy’s prayer on the Rameumptom, and you currently don’t believe this because the Rameumptom folks said that there’s no Christ, I’m going to plant this word in your heart and nourish it by your faith.

                                           00:46:23             The seed isn’t faith, the word is Christ, and it requires faith to sow it and to grow it. Then he talks about the season. You’ve got to give it time to grow roots also in Alma 32. Then as you said, Hank, he tells him, if you don’t take care of this, you will never pluck of the fruit of the tree of life. Boom. There’s your first Nephi eight reference. What are we growing here? The tree is Christ. The seed is Christ. The joy of the gospel is the joy from Christ. Well, in this one, it’s another agricultural thing, but wow, the opposition in all things that here we are trying to grow. We’ve got tares right alongside.

Hank Smith:                      00:47:03             Yeah. You’ve got to wonder if in Joseph Smith’s mind isn’t, hey, when is this great separation going to take place? We feel like we’re wheat here and we’re being attacked by the tares. The Lord is saying, well, it’s not yet. You’re yet tender. I’m not going to do that work right now.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:47:19             It’s a great testament to the patience of the Lord to let these two side by side through their growth pattern and to maturity. At what point do we see, and I’m not one who’s come from a farmer’s background and roots, but at what point does the wheat distinguish itself in a way that’s readily observable? Isn’t it true that it’s those tassels that start, I don’t know if that’s the right word, but basically the product of the good of that wheat that is filling the measure of its creation. Now we see that in clear observation. Drive across America at harvest time. Those endless fields of wheat that we see in a place like Nebraska, I guess there it is an obvious fruition. It’s come to fruition and that’s a beautiful thing. It distinguishes itself in a very natural way. It’s prospered. It’s become productive, and that signals that the time is coming for that harvest and the bringing into my house in the spiritual vein that we would think of the wheat.

Hank Smith:                      00:48:40             I really like what you said there, Bob, the end of that wheat, the head that you might say the ear of the wheat is full of grain, full of seeds. Yet here, what is the Lord saying in verses 8, 9, 10, 11, it’s priesthood continuing in the lineage, father, fathers and mothers to sons and daughters to fathers and mothers to sons and daughters. Isn’t that a beautiful little symbol there of that head of wheat, full of seed?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:49:09             And what does that impart to the next generation of wheat? It’s the seed for the next and the next and the next.

John Bytheway:               00:49:15             I think I’ve heard Anthony Sweat say, as quickly as you can get to the Savior in your teaching. But I also love the JST. I mean the audacity as some would view it. You’re changing the Bible. No, I’m clarifying it. We’ve talked about this before, that it’s not necessarily a translation of ancient text. It might just be a clarification, but to have a prophet comment on a prophet to have Jesus comment on a parable he gave, what a treasure! To have Abinadi say, let me tell you what Isaiah just said in Mosiah 15. What a treasure. Here’s what Joseph Smith said about the parable. This is teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, page 98. Now, we learned by this parable not only the setting up of the kingdom in the days of the Savior, which is represented by the good seed which produce fruit, but also the corruptions of the church, which were represented by the tares which were sewn by the enemy, which his disciples would feign have plucked up or cleansed the church of if their views had been favored by the Savior. But he, knowing all things says, not so, as much as to say your views are not correct, the church is in its infancy. If you take this rushed step, you’ll destroy the wheat or the church with the tares. Therefore, it is better to let them grow together until the harvest or to the end of the world, which means the destruction of the wicked. What I love about this is let the Lord be that judge at that time.

Hank Smith:                      00:50:42             At that moment. Yeah.

John Bytheway:               00:50:44             The question I still have for the Savior is, is it possible for a tare to become a wheat? Because it doesn’t happen in the parable, but have you ever heard of somebody investigating the opposition literature then becoming converted? I’ve just wondered that question.

Hank Smith:                      00:51:03             Yeah.

John Bytheway:               00:51:04             I have the April 6th, 1930 conference addresses. I’m sure you’ve probably perused those a dozen times, but April 6th, 1930, B.H. Roberts is speaking and he says to the congregation, we have seven temples in the land round and about the tabernacle. Ha. Imagine the day when there will be, he says, a hundred temples ha, and talked about the next century. Well, we’re not to 2030 yet. Look at how many. So that’s fun to think about that.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:51:39             Hundred’s being talked about more in the recent decades and thinking that’s a real stretch for me to imagine.

John Bytheway:               00:51:47             One of the things that this study of church history does for us is to say, you know what? There was always a time when people were leaving. Oh and coming and going. It’s always been that way.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:51:59             Yep. Yeah. We talk about it in the context of war. You look at World War II, we think of these valiant, Latter-day Saint young men going forward in terms of the valiant part of it. Well, most of them were less active. A good number of them had word of wisdom and other issues that weren’t very comfortable we wouldn’t talk about, but they also had so many of them that it pivoted their lives and they turned back to Christ. This gets into the wheat and tare all by itself, doesn’t it? That question of what is the part of this description that deals with that individual that has been that prodigal son and they came home? I certainly have seen that happen.

Hank Smith:                      00:52:39             Speaking of this parable, both of you, we can get discouraged. I’ve heard from students and parents who are discouraged by the world around us today, and sin and debauchery is everywhere around us and our children. It can be discouraging, but also look at the wheat. I’ve brought just a few statistics for you both. I would love to hear your thoughts. I had to ask a little artificial intelligence here. Temples in various phases, either dedicated, operating, under construction, three hundred and eighty two, three hundred and eighty two. Let’s go to missionary totals. There’s 75, almost 75,000 full-time teaching missionaries. 31,000 senior missionaries, 4,100, almost 4,200 young service missionaries making that a total of 110,000 active missionaries. How about another one? Almost 32,000 wards and branches. That’s over 3,600 stakes. I just wanted to read to you something pretty recent, June of 2025. Elder Cook was speaking to new mission presidents here in Provo, new mission leaders. He said, let me get this. During the first quarter of 2025, every region of the world had at least a 20% increase in the total number of convert baptisms compared to the first quarter of 2024, which 2024 was the highest baptizing year in 25 years. I know it can be discouraging seeing the tares, you might say, the wickedness around us growing, but the wheat is doing really well.

John Bytheway:               00:54:27             If you’re out there hearing the social media narratives, go to the church news, read some of those articles, read some of the teachings that the mission leaders received. It was, it’ll fire you up. It was so exciting. The wheat’s growing, isn’t it?

Hank Smith:                      00:54:42             Yep. People do leave and have left, and that’s not our job to judge. As you said earlier, John.

John Bytheway:               00:54:48             Mm-hmm.

Hank Smith:                      00:54:49             It’s not our job to say that person’s a tare and that person’s a wheat.

John Bytheway:               00:54:54             That’s probably rude.

Hank Smith:                      00:54:54             Yeah. Might be a little bit rude, but in general, when you think of how the church is doing, Bob, you know the history of the church as well as anyone, the church is doing well, that mighty stone rolls forth, and Bob, how’s the world changed since you served in England?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:55:13             Well, I mean, that’s the remarkable thing in our discussion today as we come to section 87, is to think the complexities are the section just beyond our section 88 will invite us to the study of the world that we live in, and I love that it includes things on the earth and under the earth. My degree from BYU is in geology, so I considered things under the earth a very important part of that call, but of nations and of their perplexities, and certainly we live in a time of great complexity across the board.

John Bytheway:               00:55:47             I’m glad you brought up section 88 because I thought, what a wonderful bookend. 88 is such a message of peace here in these sections. We’ve got challenges of consecration in 86. We’ve got the wheat and the tares in 87, prophecies of war and this message of peace. Didn’t Joseph Smith call it the olive leaf section 88?

Hank Smith:                      00:56:08             Yeah. Section 88. To anyone out there, it does seem dark. That is real. Look what the Lord says in verse 11. Blessed are you if you continue in my goodness, continue in my goodness, and you are a light unto the Gentiles, you will be a lowercase savior unto my people Israel. That’s beautiful guidance. As both the wheat and the tares grow together. You stay. Goodness. Continue in my goodness, be a light and a savior unto my people. Bob, with that, let’s go into section 87. We’re getting into now your career, your expertise dealing with saints at war. Here’s Joseph Smith receiving revelation about the coming, at least in the beginning here, the coming Civil War in the United States.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   00:57:08             Dominant in the Lord’s interest and instruction here is the 30 years hence approximately outbreak of a civil war that will take this nation to its knees. It’s a remarkable revelation when eventually the Civil War happens. This very revelation will be cited outside of the church as evidence that there is a prophet among us. That Joseph could have had the foresight that this revelation could take place in the window of time, Christmas day in 1832, and it’s a remarkable, remarkable thing, but it speaks also dispensation, millennially of the future and of the place of war going forward as the dispensation unfolds. I’ve said it already in our discussion today, that the adversary has found a way to divide the human family over the course of time. I have a volume that I picked up many years ago, 5,000 years of war. You realize that this is a very continual, we want an optimism about it, but we don’t see an exit ramp for war to go away.

                                           00:58:29             It has been, sadly, such a feature over time this very day. It’s interesting. I have a phone like all of us. They’re there even when we don’t want to think about it. I just had an alert that yet another wave of missiles has been launched and thwarted fortunately in the Middle East. We’re in the midst of a conflict that is complex. We pray for those who are in harm’s way, that are the innocence as we typically brand them, and for those who are doing their very most to defend liberty. This is such a powerful idea. When we think of the Book of Mormon, it’s really not a subject that comes up as frequently in the Doctrine & Covenants, but when it comes up, it’s very purposeful. We can go back and we see through the experience we generally describe as the Mormon battalion experience during the Mexican American war, and then also through the Utah war or expedition as it was more commonly known at the time, 1850s, that our saints are involved in military type action. Well, let’s take a look at some of these verses and see what we’ve got. Hank, maybe you’d be kind enough to read. Try the first three verses if we can.

Hank Smith:                      00:59:56             Let me read a little bit. Section 87, 1 through three, verily thus saith the Lord concerning the wars that will shortly come to pass beginning at the rebellion of South Carolina, which will eventually terminate in the death and misery of many souls. I looked that up. The American Civil War, the modern estimate, modern revised estimate of deaths in the modern Civil War, 850,000, the deadliest conflict in US history deaths, also many deaths from disease, not just the fighting. The time will come that war will be poured out upon all nations beginning at this place. For behold, the southern states shall be divided against the northern states, and the southern states will call on other nations. Even the nation of Great Britain, as it is called, they shall also call upon other nations in order to defend themselves against other nations. Then war shall be poured out upon all nations, and verse four talks about slaves rising up against their masters, marshaled, and disciplined for war. Then I think Bob isn’t the rest of the section about further wars into the future.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   01:01:07             Sure. Well, let’s isolate a little bit on those early verses and what that describes in terms of the Civil War, the war that really took this nation to the brink of disaster. Of course, we have presiding over the country at that time, a young leader who comes from Illinois, which is a really interesting story all by itself in connection with church history. Abraham Lincoln. I visited his boyhood home last summer. It was really great to go and see the beginnings of this remarkable voice for democracy and freedom. It’s a painful experience, but it seems somehow necessary in the refiner’s fire of what this nation would eventually become. The statistic that you just gave, Hank compares well to numbers that I brought with me here today as well. You see varying estimates, but it really was a terrible, terrible moment in history. When we catch the essence of what’s happening here, the rebellion in South Carolina, there’s a whole discussion there about federal versus states’ rights and tensions.

                                           01:02:14             There’s tariffs that are coming into play that the rebellion connects with that more so even is the question of slavery. I’m not really a trained military historian, so I wouldn’t want to assume any great authoritative voice in describing how much of what happens in the early going of the war is to finally stamp out slavery. Slavery, which is at that time a global issue, not just one with the United States, but the North and the South are really dividing themselves along some pretty hard fast lines. When the rebellion begins, when the war commences, we see this upsurge in violence and the war goes longer. It takes a greater toll than any could have envisioned at the time. But as finally the guns are silenced, talk about Appomattox and 1865, and we finally have the cessation of hostilities, it’s going to open a path toward a much brighter future for the nation.

                                           01:03:23             Most of what my study of war has entailed, has involved global conflicts from there forward. The last portion of section 87 gives us some understanding about the consistency of that pattern, what that will mean, what that will bring in whatever nation, and being observant as the Articles of Faith describes, of the calls to arms that nations have, are Latter-day Saints in whatever setting have answered those calls, and as I said earlier, have been at the forefront of making a contribution. Talk to any veteran of true wartime service that is being involved at the battles front, if you will. They have that consistent plea that those of us who have been there, who have fought in these terrible events, these tragic wars, we sure wish that they could come with a better way of solving their problems, the nations of the world, than this approach because it is so hard.

                                           01:04:28             And of course, it’s not just as you and I have offered of casualty counts of those that died who were injured in the body, but also in the mind and what the returning soldier brings back home. And we talk about this in the area of mental health and the residual things. I’ve talked to spouses of veterans that have said after a long and full life that they’ve lived with this recurring nightmares and the mental health issues. We know that suicide and other evidences of the burden that these soldiers bring home is one of the costs to society again, of these terrible events we call war. We want to get away from that pattern. We want to be peacemakers as we take on the name of Christ, a voice of advocacy, for moving away from war. Certainly that’s the call of the scriptures. Even though this gives us information about what we can expect in the future, it’s a prophecy of that kind. 1832, looking forward to our day still. Our call is to reject violence and war. We can talk about justifications for when war is warranted, if you will, but that’s almost a different kind of discussion for a different day, I think, and instead why it’s sobering. We still can have the hope that we, you and I can make a difference and being voices for peace.

Hank Smith:                      01:06:01             John, we had two episodes last year in the Book of Mormon on the war chapters. One with Dr. David Boren and the other with Dr. Justin Top, who’s a chaplain. We did talk about that there, Bob, the justification and the when and where of war if we’re not going to do that today. Bob, what do you want to do? I want to tap into your expertise here. I want to talk about saints at war. How has it been for you reading these stories, putting together these stories, writing these stories?

Prof. Robert Freeman:   01:06:36             You listen more than you speak. You really don’t need very many prompts or questions to a veteran who’s had that kind of experience, but what they’re able to give you a close feeling of what that’s like for any of us. It’s summertime here in Utah Valley and wherever your listeners are, and it’s a time of year that we have events such as the 4th of July and others like that where we commend those who have done so much for the liberties and freedoms that we enjoy. If you have a veteran in your family, if you, a veteran of your ward, we may want to learn more about their experience and and how we approach that can matter that we really demonstrate first and foremost an interest in them. Yes, commending their service, never asking them to share more than what they’re comfortable in disclosing about their experiences.

                                           01:07:31             I count it as cherished memories interviewing some of the very most humble individuals that you can imagine from really obscure settings sometimes yet pillars of their community that have done so much and demonstrated resiliency from the difficult things they’ve encountered. Just last week I had a good brother from little Beaver, Utah. I was teaching gospel doctrine in my ward, and lo and behold, I looked down and there’s my friend Howard Bradshaw from Beaver, Utah, and he’s sitting on the front row and he’s a veteran of the Korean War, if you can imagine that. In fact, his face is on the cover of one of the volumes I had the good fortune of authoring, and he was spry and in good condition, I even asked if he would be kind enough to introduce himself to those present. He stood in place and at 98 years strong, he shared a little bit about himself and our acquaintance.

                                           01:08:27             One of the reasons I mentioned him is because part of what he shared with us back when I interviewed him those 20 plus years ago was images of the first baptisms that he witnessed and was a part of in Korea. If you can imagine they’re at a seaside dressed in white. These young converts are coming into the church. What we find is that wartime environment, as terrible as it is, has often served as a beginning place for the gospel to be introduced in a place in a land. I think of humble individuals like the good brother I just described from obscure places then I think of names that we’re maybe more familiar with and would be aware of. Two sharings if I can, from names that would fit into that category. One from Elder Neal A. Maxwell a long time ago that I sat with him, we filmed his interview because we were in the early stages of developing a documentary work that was a companion to the very volume that John you held up early in our interview today, Saints at World War II.

                                           01:09:38             Elder Maxwell was kind enough to make himself available for that, and he described how that as a young 18-year-old man he was sent to a place that he really didn’t even know where on the map to locate. His mother wasn’t all together in favor of his embarking on that service at that time, such a tender age. It goes forward and he finds him placed himself in Okinawa. He shares his experiences there. He shares gathering as just a small group of Latter-day Saints on occasional services that they could conduct and have the sacrament. I don’t know if you’ve heard it said, but I think there’s truth to the idea that there really are no Sundays in wartime. Here they were. They had the priesthood, and this is a distinctive thing about our faith, is they would have the priesthood so they could conduct that service.

                                           01:10:28             They could have the sacrament. They were organized into groups. This was a first in World War II, and they would have the emblems of the sacrament. Elder Maxwell described it as being something of a roll call to know if there had been any casualties in the previous week. Now, that’s sobering to me, the notion that someone might not show up this week that was here the previous meeting. He shared that. But I also remember him saying as part of the interview, that he felt he was so fortunate they never came to hate the enemy, that he was spared that kind of an emotion of true hatred for the enemy. That he just conducted his service as best he could, obviously facing danger on a daily basis. Little did he know that many years later he would return to that same place, to Okinawa to dedicate a church worship edifice.

                                           01:11:31             To hear him talk about that and reflect on those experiences was a powerful, inspiring really, opportunity that I recall very well. We thank thee oh God for a prophet President Nelson. He also made himself available for an interview. This was just over 20 years ago when he was serving in the quorum of the 12 to describe his experiences serving during the Korean War in a military capacity. He visited all the MASH units. I don’t know if John, Hank, you’re familiar, remember that series, television series of MASH. But imagine President Nelson being in a setting like that, going from MASH unit to MASH unit and assessing the care being given to the ill and injured in uniform, tells a remarkable story about having an opportunity to meet a young Latter-day Saint who had his legs amputated due to an event that he had experienced, how he didn’t know quite what to say as he encountered this young man, but he expressed condolences and he expressed his concern for him and hope for him.

                                           01:12:48             The young man sensing, I’m sure, a little bit of awkwardness there and what Dr. Nelson was able to say at that time. He turned to me and he said, don’t worry about me now. I’m paraphrasing of course. I’ll be okay. I don’t work out my salvation with my legs. I do it another way. I think it was a transformative experience for President Nelson. I’ve seen several apostles say that because of their service in wartime, it really had an impact on their discipleship going forward, and I think that must have been such an experience for President Nelson that day.

Hank Smith:                      01:13:27             Coming up in part two of this episode.

Prof. Robert Freeman:   01:13:31             Apparently this German soldier was one of them, and so they flushed him out. He’s running in retreat, and this is where dead-eye dick, Benner Hall comes into play where he is to kind of have that sharpshooter moment there and take him out. He shoots and misses, shoots and misses. He actually takes another shot at a inanimate object that he just knows what it is and how to get it. He knocks that out just fine, but then he goes back and tries to shoot the other guy and he can’t do it.